by Justin RaimondoWhen President Obama went to Hiroshima, the American media focused on what
he would – or wouldn’t – say about Harry Truman’s horrendous war
crime against the Japanese people. Would he apologize? Leaving aside how
one apologizes for such a monstrous act – short of committing seppuku – as it
turned out he just spoke in harmless generalities about the dangers of nuclear
weapons, expressing a commendable albeit vague wish to rid the world of them.
What the pundits mostly ignored, however, was Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo
Abe’s outrage at the
latest murderous sex crime committed by an American soldier stationed on
Okinawa; the brutal murder of 20-year-old Rina Shimabukuro by a US military
contractor.
Before Obama arrived, Abe gave
vent to his anger: “I am extremely upset.
I have no words. I demand that the United States take strict measures to prevent
something like this from happening again.” Those are stern words coming from
a Japanese leader: Japanese officials almost never express strong emotions,
especially when dealing with the United States. For Abe to say he “demands”
something in this context is like Donald Trump talking about how Mexico is going
to pay for The Wall. And when Obama did arrive, Abe brought the subject up again.
As the Washington Post reported:
“Using surprisingly strong language, the Japanese prime minister said he
felt ‘profound resentment’ at the ‘self-centered and absolutely despicable crime.
“’I have asked the president to carry out effective measures to prevent
a recurrence of such crimes,’ Abe said, a solemn-faced Obama standing beside
him.”
For the craven American puppet Abe to breach protocol in this way, the provocation
would’ve had to have been enormous. And it was. The murderer, one Kenneth
Franklin Gadson, is a former US Marine turned military contractor assigned
to Okinawa’s Kadana Air Base. After sexually assaulting Shimabukuro, who had
gone for a walk near her home, Gadson dumped her body in the woods. He admitted
to the crime under questioning.
Just a few days prior, another
sex crime committed on Okinawa by a US soldier was in the news: 24-year-old
Justin Castellanos, a seaman stationed at US Marine Corps Camp Schwab, is accused
of raping a Japanese woman at a hotel. Castellanos is pleading guilty.
These are the latest in a long line of such crimes, which keep coming without
respite. Since 1972, there have been over
120 cases of rape by American military personnel on the island of Okinawa.
And that’s just the cases that are reported. All in all, there have been over 4,700 crimes
committed by US soldiers on the island since Okinawa reverted to nominal Japanese
control.
Attention came to be focused on this outrageous situation in 1995, when three
US servicemen kidnapped
a 12-year-old Japanese girl, bound her with duct-tape, and gang-raped her.
Massive protests followed, and yet since that time basically nothing has been
done. American military personnel continue to prey on Japanese women, raping
and robbing with abandon. The weak-kneed Japanese government, which allows the
continued occupation of Okinawa, loves its status as an American colony too
much to make too much of a fuss. After all, in exchange for playing out their
role as a conquered nation, the Japanese get to export cheap well-made goods
to the US tariff-free, while they refuse to drop their tariffs on American goods.
Honor is one thing, but money is quite another.
As with all its overseas colonies and protectorates, the US insists that American
murderers and rapists be tried in American courts and jailed or otherwise punished
on American territory. That’s the privilege of the conqueror, and the letter
of the US-Japan Status
of Forces Agreement. And that’s why the American-generated crime wave on
Okinawa continues
unabated
– because the perpetrators know the local authorities have no jurisdiction.
Under Japanese law, they could receive up to life in prison for rape, and Japanese
interrogations are designed to elicit
confessions: under American military law, which has been known to go
easy on crimes committed by
US soldiers abroad, they have a much easier time of it.
Why are American troops still occupying Japan? World War II has been over for
over 70 years!
Yes, there was the cold war, and there’s the alleged threat to Japan coming
from China. Yet the Japanese could deal with China all by themselves if allowed
to develop a real defensive capacity: but why should they, when the Americans
insist on shouldering the financial burden, not to mention the risk of war with
Beijing?
The Japanese are eating our lunch when it comes to trade, they get a free ride
in that they don’t have to pay for their own military, and they only have to
put up with multiple rapes and murders per year, mostly committed on Okinawa,
while issuing the appropriate “protests.”
So what are the Americans getting out of this odd arrangement?
While the Japanese export their cars to the US, we export our human trash to
Japan – our rapists, our murderers, our petty thieves. If those crimes weren’t
being committed in Okinawa, chances are they’d be afflicting Newark, New Jersey,
or Los Angeles, California. Our prisons are filled to overflowing: it’s probably
cheaper to simply export our criminals under the guise of exercising US “global
leadership.” And it keeps the US crime rate down!
Prime Minister Abe said “I have asked the president
to carry out effective measures to prevent a recurrence of such crimes,” and
yet he knows there’s just one way to do this: get US troops out of Japan, immediately
and permanently. Obama won’t do that, and Abe wouldn’t like it, either: the
Japanese have too good a deal going to give it up. Donald Trump says
he would let the Japanese start defending themselves rather than have the burden
fall on American shoulders: that may not win him many plaudits from the American
foreign policy elite, but he’d win hands down in Okinawa.
No comments:
Post a Comment